Handling Objections to Literal Creation Days (part 2 of 2)

Written by Mike Riddle

Mike is the founder and president of Creation Training Initiative. He is an international speaker and teacher on biblical creation, apologetics, and Christian education. He has been involved in creation apologetics for over 40 years.

January 26, 2017

defending-faith-imgIn part 2 of handling objections, Mike gives a thorough analysis of the following arguments and why each fails as a valid explanation for adding long ages into the Bible.

  • Plant death before sin
  • Genesis 2:4 and the word “day”
  • The Hebrew language is poetic and therefore Genesis 1 should not be taken literally.

You May Also Like…